With a 50 percent decline in animal research since 1975, we are roughly at the halfway point towards the complete elimination of animal research. Yet animals' rights are violated when they are used in research because they are not given a choice. Computers have also been used to simulate and estimate the potential damage that a product or chemical can cause, and human tissues and cells have been used to examine the effects of harmful substances. Animal rights also exist and abusing someone weaker than us is not right. If the vaccines were not tested on them, a lot of them could have died from rabies, infectious hepatitis virus, anthrax, feline leukemia, and canine parvovirus. It does not prove to contribute to medical breakthroughs. Advances in breast cancer, brain trauma, leukemia, cystic fibrosis, malaria, multiple sclerosis and tuberculosis are directly attributable to animal experimentation, and without testing on chimpanzees, there would be no hepatitis B vaccine.
If funds and resources are focused on animal-free alternatives, more humane, ethical and inexpensive solutions. Researchers are relying more and more on other methods as technology has improved and social awareness has increased, and that could be due to the cons involved. The value that humans place on their own lives should be extended to the lives of animals as well. A mouse may react positively to a treatment while a bird may have a negative reaction. All of these tests have been proven to be useful and reliable alternatives to testing products on live animals. Access to food and water is mandatory, as are shelters that follow minimum sizing standards. For the animals themselves, they often have to be purchased, which is another considerable cost.
To kill a lab rat. Most of these experts use mice, goats and other animals to test different discoveries they had and learn whether their experimentations can be used with humans. In cosmetics testing, animals would endure inhumane treatment, where they are being restrained. Included in this article is a brief overview of the pros and cons of animal testing, two short animal experimentation videos, and an infographic about animal testing and cosmetics. There is also the possibility that poor research practices could create false positive data that could then place human lives at risk. The first con is the issue of pain the animal must be going through.
Theophrastus, a successor to Aristotle, disagreed, objecting to the vivisection of animals on the grounds that, like humans, they can feel pain, and causing pain to animals was an affront to the gods. Many cosmetic companies, for example, have sought better ways to test their products without the use of animal subjects. Some proponents of animal testing objected, arguing that some animal tests had no non-animal equivalents. This test is extremely painful to the animals because death can take days or even weeks. During the experiment process, the animals involved must be taken care of, and that means money for food, housing, and any other treatment needs. In fact, over 90% of test subjects are mice, birds and rats.
This helps the scientists find a cure for certain diseases by studying these animals. One good example of this case is the Draize Test, where the eyelids of the test rabbits are being held back for at least 3 days during the test, causing them pain and discomfort. And in some cases, animals may suffer from chemical poisoning or injuries, which would force them to live the rest of their life in captivity. The drug was withdrawn in 1961 and 1968 after a long campaign. This page offers a variety of pro and con quotes about animal testing from authors, doctors, professors, and other credible professionals. The Pros and Cons of Animal Testing « Phil for Humanity A Guide for the Survival of Humankind and Helping the World, Society, and Yourself. Plus, the procedure is usually performed over the course of several months, which means that more expenses would be accumulated.
With this alternative, researchers can no longer use the excuse that they need a living, whole-body system to run experiments. The 6 craziest animal experiments. And, when testing for adverse reactions, administering small doses on humans, also known as microdosing, also offers an alternative. There is no guarantee that a particular product will not harm us just because it didn't harm the particular species on which it was tested. It provides an opportunity to examine a complete life cycle.
Wouldn't you prefer being killed in one shot, rather than enduring poking needles, cuts and poisonous chemicals being injected into your system and being kept caged in a really small space for what seems like all eternity? List of Pros of Animal Experimentation 1. This synthetic material turns opaque when a product damages it, closely resembling the way that a real eye reacts to harmful substances. That means animals will likely be sacrificing their lives to determine the safety of a product that a human will never even know was being developed. Animals are chosen to be the living organisms where particular medicinal discoveries are tried. Incidentally, these animals comprise 90 percent of the animals used in research. It passes drugs that are not necessarily safe.
That means there are more than 20 million animals who could be at a high risk of abuse or neglect in the name of research. Now multiple those costs over an entire laboratory and the cost of animal research becomes very high, very quickly. Every coin has two sides, so does animal testing. Better to use animals than humans for testing, right? Indeed, there is no reason to believe that animal testing is a necessary component of achieving new medical insight. Cons of Animal Research Using animals in research is a costly methodology. People have different feelings for animals; many look upon animals as companions while others view animals as a means for advancing medical techniques or furthering experimental research.
Agreed, when people say millions of animals are killed worldwide for food. For instance, improved laundry detergent in an experiment that may not even prove successful is not necessarily a very good reason to risk harming the health of an animal. These 'products', which range from prescription drugs to cosmetics, are tested on animals to check for the degree of skin irritation, skin penetration, eye irritation, carcinogenicity, etc. Above all, though, is that the testing certainly can and often does involve the pain and suffering of the animals. Through animal testing, drugs have been developed to treat human and veterinary ailments. Animals feel pain in many of the same ways that humans do; in fact, their reactions to pain are virtually identical both humans and animals scream, for example.