This flowchart is meant for one who has a specific intent of choosing a particular type of article and not for one who intends to browse through a journal. When you analyze an article, you are trying to demonstrate your critical thinking ability. Review articles do not usually follow the above pattern, unless they are systematic reviews or meta-analysis. Be sure to write down the source of each quote so that you can reference it in the essay. Stick to the important points.
If there are only a few relevant findings, list all of them, but if there are many, list only the few that you think are most important. Sections of This Topic Include Also see Also See the Library's Blogs Related to Analyzing Research Results In addition to the articles on this current page, see the following blogs which have posts related to Analyzing Research Results. Provide some cursory research about the writer of the article. Remember that you need to change both the words of the sentence and the word order. You can do it basically the same way as described in the article. Just like any other analysis paper, you will need to understand your audience to come up with a tone that suits them. Upon further examination, it becomes clear that the author is arguing that new research suggests the best cure for diabetes is the surgical solution of a gastric bypass.
At times, there is a tendency for people to become derailed and find them merely making summary points of articles without challenging and analyzing them. You can use the various Who's Who publications for the U. Was the sampling of these units probability or nonprobability? The reader should meticulously go through this segment of the manuscript and find out whether the results were reliable same results over time and valid measure what it is supposed to measure. You have to understand the type of article under analysis so that you can be able to come up with the preferred tone of your essay. Write the reference in such an order: last name of the author, initials, publication year, title of the article, name of the journal in italics, volume, page numbers if necessary. You need to give the reader an idea of whether the author of an article based it on facts and credible information.
This is where you should tell me if the units of analysis are different from the sampling units. One option is to make an outline of the work, while the second is the write a brief summary. Was the sampling of these units probability or nonprobability? You should be able to write an eye-catching conclusion so that you can be able to score highly on your paper. Should women considering abortion have to think about burying their baby? Often, there will be a sentence in the article which says that main idea. Identify the main ideas of the work in order to analyze its structure. For works of fiction or paintings, you will need to ask yourself what evidence the author presents in an attempt to explain his or her thesis. When I strated to write my first Hub the other day, based on an article I read elsewhere and some personal experience, I decided I needed to brush up on the process.
Most critical reviews will be a mix of positive and negative. Readers should distinguish true experimental designs with random assignment from pre-experimental research designs. If any research question or hypothesis is confirmed by your data and analysis, you can point to a table or figure that illustrates your finding. You read the whole thing through and underline the parts which seem the most important. If the answer is no, the reader should check whether any explanation was provided. Re-read all of those sentences, and you should have all of the main ideas of the essay. You should be able to state the findings of the research in your essay so that the reader can understand you.
Is there anything missing in the explanation? If there are both simple and complicated variables in your article and you choose to talk about the simple ones, I will assume you do not understand operationalization, which is not in your best interests. Your summary should be as short and concise as possible. I am referring to simple random error here; you need to identify variables that are potential threats to internal validity. End with a conclusion of how the article is useful to readers. They have been selected for their relevance and highly practical nature.
Examples: on stage effects for research on historical documents, maturation or other time-tied variables for research that is conducted in one short period. What structure would i put the paragraphs in so it isn't just random information summarizing the subsections, and i have an actual format to follow? Does it comply with the main requirements of the citation style? The examiner will grade you depending on what they can remember well about your paper, and your conclusion is usually the game changer. Are there variables that should be controlled that were not? Methods: The reader should begin by reading the title, abstract and conclusions first. . Is the author's argument repetitive? If you follow all the recommendations, you will easily complete an outstanding article critique without any efforts! Your answer to this should be based on what the author says in the introduction to the article, not in the methods section. Occasionally, the author doesn't actually say the main idea, but gives you a lot of details and lets you read them and decide on the main idea by yourself.
It can be easy to skip over these supplements as you read the article, but you should not ignore them completely. You provide the type of information that I can easily follow. Is the order of information clear? Hi Hazel, I am very happy to have you share this information by giving students a link to my website or showing my website information in class. You should explore enough sources to obtain a variety of viewpoints. A research paper is not the most difficult academic assignment. If someone wrote a five-page essay on colors but spells 'black' wrong consistently, then it's not likely an author who's very competent.